In evaluation, what term describes the counterfactual scenario—what would have happened without the program?

Study for the Road Safety Professional Level 1 Exam. Enhance your knowledge with multiple-choice questions and explanations. Prepare effectively and succeed!

Multiple Choice

In evaluation, what term describes the counterfactual scenario—what would have happened without the program?

Explanation:
Counterfactual reasoning is the idea tested here: what would have happened if the program had not been implemented. This hypothetical scenario provides the baseline for comparison so we can see the actual impact by contrasting real outcomes with what would have occurred in its absence. Attribution involves linking outcomes to the program, causality is the broader study of cause-and-effect relationships, and validity is about the trustworthiness of the findings. The counterfactual specifically names the no-program scenario used for that comparison.

Counterfactual reasoning is the idea tested here: what would have happened if the program had not been implemented. This hypothetical scenario provides the baseline for comparison so we can see the actual impact by contrasting real outcomes with what would have occurred in its absence. Attribution involves linking outcomes to the program, causality is the broader study of cause-and-effect relationships, and validity is about the trustworthiness of the findings. The counterfactual specifically names the no-program scenario used for that comparison.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy